Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitfield, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Broussard, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Are Client–Counselor Ethnic/Racial Matches Associated With Successful Rehabilitation Outcomes?

Harold Wayne Whitfield1*, Riley Venable2, and Shanna Broussard2

1 Beaumont Mayor's Committee for People With Disabilities
2 Texas Southern University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: harold{at}haroldwhitfieldedd.org.


   Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine if client–counselor ethnic/racial matches were associated with successful vocational rehabilitation (VR) outcomes. There was no significant difference in acceptance rates for VR services. Client– counselor ethnic/racial matches had a significantly higher rehabilitation rate than client–counselor mismatches. Reasons for closure were examined with logistic regression analysis. "Achieved an employment outcome," "individual in institution," and closure for "all other reasons" were significantly associated with client–counselor matches. This study also examined the amount of time counselors took to determine eligibility, the amount of funds counselors expended on services, the amount of time applicants were in the VR program, and the weekly wages of applicants at case closure while controlling for disability and education at application. A multivariate analysis of variance revealed no significant differences. Implications of these findings are discussed.

First published on June 8, 2009
Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 2009, doi:10.1177/0034355209338526


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?