Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mpofu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Conyers, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Representational Theory Perspective of Minority Status and People with Disabilities

Implications for Rehabilitation Education and Practice

Elias Mpofu

The Pennsylvania State University, exm31{at}psu.edu

Liza M. Conyers

The Pennsylvania State University

Minority is a term that has become particularly visible within the rehabilitation literature due to the increasing focus on the application of minority models to the understanding of the disability experience. At the same time, it is also one of the most ill-defined and misunderstood terms. In this article, the authors explore the meaning of minority status by discussing its core elements from a representational theory perspective. By doing so, they show that minority status is different from racial, ethnic, and cultural membership, although it partially overlaps with each of these constructs in some contexts. The authors argue that although race, culture, and ethnic minority status can attenuate or exacerbate minority status in some settings, these demographics are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions for minority status. Finally, the authors illustrate how many people with disabilities meet the essential criteria for minority status as outlined by representational theory and draw implications for rehabilitation practice, education, and research.

Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, Vol. 47, No. 3, 142-151 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/00343552040470030301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
J. L. Werth Jr., N. J. Borges, C. J. McNally, C. P. Maguire, and P. J. Britton
The Intersections of Work, Health, Diversity, and Social Justice: Helping People Living With HIV Disease
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 16 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rehabil Couns BullHome page
E. Mpofu and D. A. Harley
Racial and Disability Identity: Implications for the Career Counseling of African Americans With Disabilities
Rehabil Couns Bull, October 1, 2006; 50(1): 14 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]