This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tarvydas, V. M. Articles by Saunders, J. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A Comparison of the Ethical Beliefs of Certified Rehabilitation Counselors and National Certified Counselors

The University of Iowa

Michael J. Leahy

Michigan State University

Jodi L. Saunders

The University of Iowa

Results of a national survey of certified rehabilitation counselors (CRCs) are compared with those obtained by Gibson and Pope (1993) from a national sample of national certified counselors (NCCs) to determine their beliefs about whether particular behaviors are ethical, and the degree of consensus or controversy about these behaviors. Commonalities and differences in the beliefs of these two groups are described. Implications for education and the field of rehabilitation counseling are discussed. The authors conclude that the high degree of similarity between beliefs of CRC and NCC respondents provides empirical support that these counselors share a fundamental set of ethical beliefs.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. R. Shaw and F. J. Lane Content Analysis of the Advisory Opinion Archive of the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification Rehabil Couns Bull, April 1, 2008; 51(3): 170 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF]