This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fong Chan Articles by Allen, C. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Structural Equation Modeling in Rehabilitation Counseling Research

University of Wisconsin-Madison, chan{at}education.wisc.edu

Gloria K. Lee

University at Buffalo-SUNY

Eun-Jeong Lee

Illinois Institute of Technology

Coleen Kubota

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Chase A. Allen

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Structural equation modeling (SEM) has become increasingly popular in counseling, psychology, and rehabilitation research. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the basic concepts and applications of SEM in rehabilitation counseling research using the AMOS statistical software program.

References

• Arbuckle, J., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4 user's reference guide. Chicago: Smallwaters Corp.
• Banks, S., & Kerns, R. (1996). Explaining high rates of depression in chronic pain: A diathesis—stress framework. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 95—110.[CrossRef]
• Beck, A. (1967). Depression. New York: Harper & Row.
• Beck, A. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1(1), 5—37.
• Bentler, P.M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
• Bentler, P.M., & Chou, C.P. (1987). Practical issues in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78—117.[Abstract]
• Bishop, M., Berven, N.L., Hermann, B.P., & Chan, F. (2002). Quality of life among adults with epilepsy: An exploratory model. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 87—95, 113.
• Bollen, K.A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303—317.[CrossRef]
• Brookings, J.B., & Bolton, B. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis of a measure of intrapersonal empowerment. Rehabilitation Psychology, 45, 292—298.[CrossRef]
• Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Carmines, E.G. & McIver, J.P. (1981), Analyzing models with unobservable variables. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta, (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65—115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Harland, N.J., & Georgieff, K. (2003). Development of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire 24, a clinically utilitarian version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48, 296— 300.
• Keefe, F.J., Rumble, M.E., Scipio, C.D., Giordano, L.A., & Perri, L.M. (2004). Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science. Journal of Pain, 5, 195-211.[CrossRef]
• Kosciulek, J.F. (2005). Structural equation model of the consumer-directed theory of empowerment in a vocational rehabilitation context. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 49, 40—49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Kosciulek, J.F., & Merz, M.A. (2001). Structural analysis of the consumer-directed theory of empowerment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44, 209—216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Landis, R.S., Beal, D.L., & Tesluck, P.E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to form composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186—207.[Abstract]
• MacCallum, R.C., & Austin, J.T. (2001). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychology research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201—226.
• MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130—149.[CrossRef]
• Martens, M.P. (2005). The use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. Counseling Psychologist, 33, 269—298.[Abstract]
• McDonald, R.P., & Ho, M.R. (2002). Principles and practices in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64—82.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Miller, M.A., & Rahe, R.H. (1997). Life changes scaling for the 1990s. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43, 279—292.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Mueller, R.O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling. An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer.
• Price, D.D., Harkins, S.W., & Baker, C. (1987). Sensory-affective relationships among different types of clinical and experimental pain. Pain, 28, 297—307.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Quintana, S.M., & Maxwell, S.E. (1999). Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. Counseling Psychologist, 27, 485—527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385—401.[Abstract]
• Rosenstiel, A.K., & Keefe, F.J. (1983). The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patient: Relationship to patients' characteristics and current adjustment. Pain, 17, 33—44.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). Pain measures. In A. L. Stewart & J. E. Ware, Jr. (Eds.), Measuring functioning and well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study approach (pp. 220—234). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Steiger, J.H. (2001). Driving fast in reverse: The relationship between software development, theory, and education in structural equation modeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 331—338.[CrossRef]
• Strohmer, D.C., & Leierer, S.J. (2000). Modeling rehabilitation counselor clinical judgment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44, 3—9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Tomarken, A.J., & Waller, N.G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31—65.
• Ullman, J.B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th ed., pp. 653—771). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P.M. (2001). Effect of outliers on estimators and tests in covariance structure analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 161—175.[CrossRef]

Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, Vol. 51, No. 1, 44-57 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/00343552070510010701


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fong Chan Articles by Allen, C. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?