|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Newly Revised Strong Interest InventoryA Profile Interpretation for Rehabilitation Counselors
Stephen J. Leierer
University of Memphis, Tennessee, sleierer{at}memphis.edu
Terry L. Blackwell
Montana State University-Billings
Douglas C. Strohmer
University of Memphis, Tennessee
Richard C. Thompson
Consulting Psychology Press, Inc., Palo Alto, California
David A. C. Donnay
MDA Leadership Consulting, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Using aggregate scores from 281 female and 133 male rehabilitation counselors, the researchers developed prototypical Strong Interest Inventory (SII) profiles. They used these profiles to explore the interests, preferences, and professional identity of rehabilitation counselors. Using the General Occupational Themes (GOTs), Basic Interest Scales (BISs), Occupational Scales (OSs), and Personal Style Scales (PSSs), which make up the newly revised SII, the authors obtained empirically defined prototypical profiles for female and male rehabilitation counselors. The Social—Artistic Holland-code dyad was a reoccurring theme across the each profile. Although there are differences in each of the SII scales across genders, the authors found congruence not only within the scales of a particular gender but also across genders. Consistencies and inconsistencies among the GOTs, BISs, OSs, and PSSs are discussed. Implications for counselor recruitment and practice are also discussed.
Key Words: career assessment vocational assessment rehabilitation counselors professional issues
References
- Case, J.C., & Blackwell, T.L. (2008). [Review of the Strong Interest Inventory®]. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51, 122—126.[Free Full Text]
- Dawis, R.V. (2002). Person-environment-correspondence theory. In D. Brown & Associates (Ed.), Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 427—465). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Donnay, D.A.C., Morris, M.L., Schaubhut, N.A., & Thompson, R.C. (2004). Strong Interest Inventory® manual: Research, development, and strategies for interpretation. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
- Graduate Schools in Rehabilitation Counseling. ( 1998). U.S. News and World Report, 57.
- Grutter, J., & Hammer, A.L. (2004). Strong Interest Inventory® user's guide: Practitioner's tool for understanding, interpretation, and use of the Strong Profile and Interpretive Report. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
- Holland, J.L. (1987). Current status of Holland's career theory: Another perspective. Career Development Quarterly, 36, 31—34.
- Holland, J.L. (1992). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed): Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Janes, M.E., & Emener, W.G. (1986). Rehabilitation counselor education graduates' perceptions of their employment and career satisfaction. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29, 182—189.
- Leierer, S.J., Strohmer, D.C., Blackwell, T.L., Thompson, R.C., & Donnay, D.A.C. (2008). The Rehabilitation Counselor Scale: A new scale for the Strong Interest Inventory. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 51, 68—75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lofquist, L.H., & Dawis, R.V. (1991). Essentials of person-environment-correspondence counseling. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Matkin, R.E., & Bauer, L.L. (1993). Assessing predeterminants of job satisfaction among certified rehabilitation counselors in various work settings. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 24(1), 26—33.
- Osborn, D.S., & Zunker, V.G. (2006). Using assessment results for career development (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Patterson, C.H. (1962). Test characteristics of rehabilitation counselor trainees. Journal of Rehabilitation, 28(5), 15—16.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Prince, J.P., & Heiser, L.J. (2000). Essentials of career interest assessment. New York: John Wiley.
- Reardon, R.C., Bullock, E.E., & Meyer, K.E. (2005). A Holland perspective on the workforce from 1960 to 2000. Career Development Quarterly, 55, 262—274.
- Reardon, R., & Lenz, J. (1998). The Self-Directed Search: A practitioner's guide to the SDS and other Holland-based career materials. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Rubin, S.E., & Roessler, R.T. (2001). Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process (5th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
- U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Occupational outlook handbook, 2006-07 edition: Human resources, training, and labor relations managers and specialists. Retrieved June 27, 2007, from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos021.htm
Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, Vol. 51, No. 2,
76-84 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0034355207311342

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Leierer, D. C. Strohmer, T. L. Blackwell, R. C. Thompson, and D. A. C. Donnay
The Rehabilitation Counselor Scale: A New Scale for the Revised Strong Interest Inventory
Rehabil Couns Bull,
January 1, 2008;
51(2):
68 - 75.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|